Roman Polanski’s Rape Victims Says Media Frenzy Was More Traumatic Than The Sex

This proves what we’ve been saying all along. Paedophile hysteria damages children more than sex.

Advertisements
Posted in News, Paedohysteria | 4 Comments

Police officer attempted suicide after a woman falsely accused him of rape

As the title suggests, read the article here. Police arresting police, funny! Hope it will make the falsely accused police officer think a bit before he arrests some other man for rape.

Posted in Men's Rights, News | Leave a comment

Sticky: New Site Name

(Sticky: keeping this post at the top – see below for new posts)

So, as I mentioned quite some time ago, this site name sucks a bit so I might consider changing it. Partly from the discussions in the aforementioned thread I’ve come up with a few options that I like:

Please vote 🙂 Also other suggestions welcome!

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

Ireland Bans Sex Offenders From Travelling – Blame Paedophile Priest Shay Cullen

In a shocking move Ireland has decided to ban sex offenders from travelling overseas at the request of suspected paedophile priest Shay Cullen. The evidence against Shay Cullen suggesting that he is a paedophile is:

  • He is male
  • He is a priest
  • He travels overseas to poor countries to “help” children using a foreign “child abuse charity” called PREDA, that he started, presumably as a smokescreen to hide his activities

I am 100% convinced that this man is a hardcore paedophile and, most significantly, hypocritical subhuman piece of shit. Quite frankly, prison would be too good for him. I’m actually surprised that the Irish parliament would go along with someone who is so obviously a paedophile, but then again, most politicians are all paedophiles too.

[UPDATE]

I have now found a website with a lot of evidence suggesting that Shay Cullen *is* a paedophile. Not just a paedophile, but a predatory rapist paedophile and had infact been indicted by the legal system on child rape charges but due to his powerful position he was able to escape prosecution. I absolutely knew it! But this just goes to show the kind of hypocrites we’re up against. We have priests who are real violent rapists changing laws to punish men who have done nothing worse than kissing their 15 year old girl friend. We have police officers distributing child porn to punish men who are merely looking at it, we have police officers forcing a young boy to have an erection so they can photograph his penis and jail him.

If the Irish parliament pass this law then every one of their scumbag politicians should hang their heads in shame.

Posted in Hypocrisy, Men's Rights, News, Paedohysteria | 4 Comments

Police Distribute Child Porn, VG Newspaper Downloads Child Porn and Guardian Celebrates

In an example of corruption so extreme that you just couldn’t make it up the Australian Police have been found to have distributed child pornography. The police Taskforce was lead by unconvicted paedophile Jon Rouse (don’t forget his name!). Supposedly under Australian Law the police have legal protections that allow them to commit acts of grave criminality. This shows what a hypocritical feminist police state Australia has become.

To make matters even more insane, the Norwegian Newspaper VG were, while the police were running the site, busily downloading and fapping off to child porn from it. The paper’s paedophile IT expert Einar Otto Stangvik, paedophile journalist Håkon Fostervold Høydal as well as paedophile editor-in-chief Gard Steiro are believed to have been involved in the child porn fapping orgy. It appears that the police will not be arresting them, even though they have clearly broken the law. Presumably this is because the journalists constitute part of the police state apparatus (I can only assume VG are a very pro-police, pro-feminist newspaper, though any Norwegian readers of mine might be able to confirm further). My assumption is further supported by the fact that The Guardian (one of the world’s most dangerous feminist rags and generally highly supportive of the police as long as they are beating up a white male) seems very happy that the VG paedophiles have been let off and highly supportive of the sickening hypocrisy of global police forces.

What we can draw from this operation of sickening hypocrisy is that there is no rule of law. The police are nothing less than a gang of thugs who must be overpowered by the public trying to organise against them (certainly paedophile Jon Rouse should be strung up). Do not obsess over whether something is “legal” or not as it really doesn’t matter.

Posted in Hypocrisy, News, Paedohysteria | Leave a comment

Inciting Violence Against Feminists: Because They Did It First

I read a great article by Rod Liddle today on how even documentaries like Liar – which is about a woman accusing a man of rape – turn out to be corrupted by feminists. Unsurprisingly in the end it turns out that the man is a liar and “rapist” when usually in these kinds of cases it is the woman who is the liar and has something to hide.

Other than getting your blood boiling what relevance does this have to inciting violence against feminists? Well, it was the last paragraph in the article that really stood out for me:

I hope the writers of Liar come home tomorrow night to find their homes ablaze, their treasured possessions reduced to ash and embers, borne on the winds across north and west London. I would happily roast chestnuts on the conflagration. You see? That’s what happens. Turn on the TV and I become a bad person. Although no worse than the dwarves think I am already.

That was a brave thing to say in my opinion as politically correct media pundits, legislators, judges and police officers have over the past few decades created a frightful environment whereby many people are afraid of being arrested for saying what they really think. This went to the point of arresting and convicting Paul Chambers – who was fortunately eventually cleared – for making the joke tweet:

Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You’ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together, otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high!!

But of course the fact he was cleared is irrelevant as all most people heard was that they have to be very careful with what they say or they WILL be arrested. I imagine the whole political purpose of bringing the case was for the politically correct elites to frighten people into not speaking out. We began to live in a democracy only by name – only those who had the right views could participate in the democratic process, anyone else would be hounded out as having “politically incorrect views”.

But it seems like that is changing, the fact that Rod Liddle spoke out is a great sign. Whether he’ll be arrested or not under the notoriously vague Malicious Communications Act remains to be seen, but his article was published by The Spectator so his views are clearly supported by others. One thing I’ve noticed with UK enforcement of free speech laws is that they have tended to shy away from arresting people with well articulated political opinions that a lot of people might agree with, and I think in today’s climate it’s clearly that a lot of people are angry with feminist rape laws so the establishment might well end up shying away from making arrests for this. I think part of the reason is because even though free speech in the UK is technically illegal, making an arrest discredits the idea that “Britain is a free country”. This means the establishment are more likely to endure rioting or poor election results and those who are capable of giving strong arguments for their beliefs and refuse to apologise are extremely dangerous for the establishment to arrest – an arrest only gives them more publicity and credibility.

I know I’ve also been guilty in the past of morally supporting violence against certain feminist people who have engaged in particularly horrific violence against others. But that’s really the point I want to make. The global narrative for free speech seems to be that free speech is OK as long as it doesn’t involve advocating violence. But what if the people who you are advocating violence against were the ones who started advocating violence first? And what if the police decide only to arrest one side? Indeed this seems to be largely the case, consider the following examples:

  • A man advocating for a feminist woman to be raped is likely to be arrested by the police, we’ve all heard of it happening
  • A woman advocating for men to be killed will not be arrested. Even the high profile case of Bahar Mustafa who, despite eventually being arrested after anti-feminist outrage at her comments, was released without charge.

Worse still, what if the other side – the feminist side who the police aren’t arresting – are guilty of not just advocating violence, but actual violence against innocent people? Whereas the side the police are arresting (men) are merely guilty of advocating violence against those who have engaged in real violence? Where is the fairness, where is the justice, in all of that? And when, worse still, it is the police themselves who actively participate in this real violence. Police happily arrest men on ‘fake rape’ charges that they know are false or are likely to be false. They place them in prisons for decades where they are raped and beaten before releasing them onto the ‘Sex Offender Registry’ where the police repeatedly harass them in their homes, place them on a public hit list and prevent them from continuing with their lives.

Get real. The system is sick. The feminist morals are sick and hypocritical. There’s no legitimate non-partisan argument to say it’s wrong to advocate violence against feminists who have engaged in real violence and who, by the way, are currently totally unaccountable except for our ability to say what we think should be done to them in the hope of emotionally persuading enough people to move our justice system towards a fairer more gender-neutral setup.

At the end of the day feminists have engaged in violence and you are morally entitled to state what you think should happen to them, including against any police officers who have also engaged in the brutality. That’s not called a “malicious communication” it’s called “justice”.

Posted in Free Speech, Hypocrisy, Men's Rights | 2 Comments

Feminist Cop Wannabe Jailed for False Rape Allegations

A feminist student who wished to become a police officer (presumably so she could wrongly jail hundreds or thousands of men on allegations of rape and child molestation) has thankfully been jailed before her career had even begun. She was found guilty of falsely accusing a taxi driver of rape and jailed for 16 months (unfortunately a light sentence considering the magnitude of her crime).

It’s unfortunate that her mindset clearly illustrates the kind of people who join our police force. No wonder the police are so rotten, though on this rare occasion it seems they did the correct thing. Hopefully it will serve as a deterrent to others.

Posted in Men's Rights, News | 8 Comments