9 Reasons Why Child Porn Laws Are Evil

When I started writing this article I couldn’t believe how many reasons I could come up with as to why child pornography laws are totally wrong. So without further ado, it’s time to abolish this offence from our legal statutes; and here’s no less than 9 reasons why:-


1. Child abuse images are completely legal, while child porn images are not

Imagine, hypothetically, you came across a video on the internet that featured a seedy man in a dark room with a big, sharp hammer. The man had a look of pure evil in his eyes and in a corner of the room hudled a young girl. The man slowly took a step towards her, ‘I’m going to hit you’ he said softly. The girl had a look of terror on her face. He shook his hammer in the air and she reflexively put her hands around her head. ‘I’m going to kill you’ he said louder taking another step. He lifted his hammer high up in the air. Suddenly the child made a desperate bid to run away but he grabbed her and struck a blow to her skull. Her skull could be seen to be smashed and blood poured out. The camera showed him hitting her again and again and again until there was nothing left other than a lifeless decapitated mess on the floor. Then the video ended.

Would you have not thought that such a horrific video would be illegal and probably classed as level 5 child porn (the most severe)?

Think again.

In reality extreme child abuse images like those depicted above are completely legal. Why? Because it is not sexual. It is horrific violence. In our society violence and abuse are celebrated while sex, love and affection are criminalised.

A man possessing bath photos of 5 year old girls would receive years, even decades, in prison. A man possessing the hypothetical video above would not receive even a single day behind bars.

And this is the legal situation that our hateful and vindictive politicians support.

As Orwell might have said: Our politicians have redefined Child Abuse to be Child Love and Child Love to be Child Abuse.

2. Child porn is not child abuse

Not only are the most horrific child abuse images completely legal and not considered to be child porn, but most of what counts as child pornography does not even depict child abuse.

Let us examine the definitions of child pornography under the COPINE scale (or SAP scale as it is more accurately referred to), this is the scale typically used by the police when measuring the ‘severity’ of a child porn image. It goes from level 1 (least severe) to level 5 (most severe).

By examining the definitions of child porn on the COPINE scale we find that child pornography images levels 1 – 4 are categorically NOT abuse images. This is because level 1 covers bath photos and levels 2 – 4 cover sexual activity only, no mention of violence is made. As we know from the RIND meta study, which analysed some 59 other studies it found that sexual activity with children does not usually cause harm, contrary to contemporary feminist dogma.

Any image in which pain is implied is automatically elevated to level 5 on the COPINE scale. This does not, however, imply that level 5 images always involve pain. This is because any image with an animal involved in any way at all would also count as level 5. Nor does it imply that any image involving pain is level 5 – as discussed above an image of a child being brutally murdered would not be considered child pornography at all despite that being the most horrific thing that can happen to a person.

3. Child porn is a thought crime

Child porn is a thought crime. It involves no actions. Merely being a curious individual and seeking possession of a single image can result in decades behind bars. This is the same way that possession of a blank book would have resulted in 20 years behind bars in the novel 1984. The creation of thought crime legislation is the primary indicator of a full blown totalitarian state.

No harm is ever committed in having thoughts, even bad or dangerous ones. If people cannot express and discuss their thoughts then they will in many cases suffer in silence and in other cases explode in outbursts of extreme violence such as, for example, virgin killers like Elliot Rodger.

4. Criminalising any image is an affront to democracy

Freedom of speech and freedom of expression are essential components of a democracy.

Child pornography laws undermine freedom of expression. Possessing and distributing child porn is free expression.

The consequences of undermining freedom of expression cannot be understated. A country without freedom of expression cannot be a democracy. Without an informed and educated electorate the voters are merely sheep voting based only on what they are allowed to know. However, if they were provided with the full facts then they would have come to wildly different voting decisions.

In essence the society we live in today is a pseudo-democracy. A society where an uninformed and ignorant electorate vote. This leads to tyranny. Already we can see this with the massive escalation of child porn and child sex sentences worldwide and its associated age of consent dogma. The belief that sexual activity with anyone below the age of consent is always horrific abuse is caused in part by the criminalisation of child pornography i.e. the removal of evidence that breaking age of consent laws does not cause harm in and of itself.

It is modern day book burning.

As older folk who lived in more tolerant times die out the society becomes increasingly ignorant to the point that reality becomes entirely warped, as is happening with the Savile affair in Britain, including absurd claims that he engaged in necrophilia.

The road to tyranny is then well and truly laid.

5. Banning one thing leads to the ‘slippery slope’ effect of banning everything

As soon as one thing is banned it then becomes acceptable to start banning more things until even you are classed as a serious organised criminal, sex offender or terrorist (if you aren’t already).

This is already happening with the expanding definition of child pornography. For example, in the UK it was initially limited to children under 16. Then it got expanded to ‘children’ under 18, despite the age of consent still being 16. Laws were then introduced to criminalise not only ‘real’ images but also cartoon drawings. So-called ‘extreme pornography’ which included adults engaging in bestiality or BDSM also became criminalised. And now, images of women pretending to be raped is in the process of being criminalised.

This of course ignores the onslaught of anti-terrorist legislation, which makes glorifying terrorism illegal and has some extreme double standards. The terrorist murder of Osama Bin Laden for instance, glorified by the mainstream media, was not seen as criminal whilst calling for genocidal politicians from the American or British regimes to be hung, drawn and quartered would be. And let us not even get into the minefield of ‘hate speech’ legislation – such as ‘anti-racist’ speech…

The bottom line is that banning has become endemic to our political class. They will only ever be satisfied once everything is criminalised and the entire population live in cages.

6. Child porn laws undermine the rule of law

The rule of law is essential to a peaceful society where random violence is minimised. The state must not be able to arbitrarily arrest people just because they can. There must be the appropriate checks and balances.

Child pornography laws allow the arbitrary arrest of just about anyone. Anyone who has ever used the internet can easily be raided by the police on suspicion of possessing or distributing child pornography. All that is needed for a conviction is for the police to find one single thumbnail image. Such an image can often be placed in a defendant’s possession without their knowledge as a consequence of computer viruses, accidental website hits as well as vengeful colleagues, friends and wives who deliberately frame an individual. Even if the defendent accidentally came across the image and deleted it immediately the police can still find it, charge and convict the man for a thought crime offence.

This process can also lead to ‘selective enforcement’ in other words those who stand up against the prevailing ideology or police state would be automatically raided by the police and likely found to be in possession of child porn. On the otherhand, high ranking paedofinder general politicians would never be raided even though they probably possess more child porn than anyone else (they need to behave like paedofinder generals to reduce their risk of arrest, afterall).

7. Child porn laws are so excessively broad that they effectively rape children of their childhood

Child pornography laws are now so broad that even non-nude images can count as child porn. The paedohysterical atmosphere has resulted in a climate so extreme that schools frequently ban parents from photographing their own children. This means that youth growing up today will not have any photos of their childhood. Their childhood is essentially stolen from them by the police state. And worst of all, children are prevented from learning about life (like playing on the streets, as kids used to do) and from forming normal relationships with adults (especially men).

In essence, child pornography laws and our paedohysterical atmosphere effectively rape children of their childhood by stealing from them what past generations took for granted.

8. Banning child porn allows child rapists and child abusers to walk free

It is a well known fact that police officers are lazy. They like to go for the easiest to lynch people. There is no one easier to lynch than sexting teenagers. Often unaware that what they are doing is even illegal they become an easy catch for the paedophile unit. The propagation of child pornography and age of consent laws means that making arrests is like shooting fish in a barrel. And amongst the fish, big bad fish can hide and not be shot because they are not the targets.

Criminalising low-level, harmless consensual sexual behaviour results in kind and harmless individuals being piled up in prison whilst real violent thugs and rapists are free to abuse and rape again.

9. Those who seek to ban child pornography are all paedophiles themselves anyway

Much like many in the Nazi party were homosexuals many of our legislators, especially anti child pornography legislators, are infact paedophiles themselves. Take the arrest of Cameron’s close aide Patrick Rock on suspected child pornography charges as an example of this.

One arrest you say? Just a bad apple? How about the revelations that some senior cabinet ministers in Tony Blair’s former government were believed to be fapping off to child porn? Not only that, but the government issued D-Notices to the mainstream media to stop them reporting on the story. And they all obeyed.

What does this, in essence, mean? It means that what is commonly called ‘paedophilia’ is really normal male sexuality. It means that our politicians are all a bunch of hypocrites who criminalise normal male sexuality in order to endlessly increase their power. And then they break their own laws. They are opportunistic bastards.

Already more and more people are starting to talk about ‘paedophiles in high places’. I can only but guess that some of this is because the population are getting sick of paedophile hysteria yet they are too scared or too stupid to point out that the laws themselves are the problem.


The conclusion is this: Our political class have started a witch hunt that has now destroyed the lives of millions across the globe. The witch hunt and criminalisation of thoughts and love has no justification. Our politicians have blood on their hands and they know it.

Fortunately, now they too are starting to fall prey to the evil witch hunt that they have created. Unless some of our politicians want to be lynched themselves under their own laws, it is time they stand up and accept that what they have started was wrong, is wrong and will always be wrong. It’s time to be brave and say goodbye to feminist inspired sexual offence legislation.

Either that or we’ll all be waving our families and friends (even ourselves) off to meet their deaths in a 21st century Auschwiz in only a few years time.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Articles, Crimes Against Humanity, Paedohysteria. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to 9 Reasons Why Child Porn Laws Are Evil

  1. mr p says:

    The government like to manufacture rules,only to break them themselves,because
    they are the exception to the rule apparently!

    To them it’s better to have 1000 image viewers behind bars then 10 child rapists!

  2. Zeus says:

    One thing I want to add to this is that most of the material legally classed as “child porn” is just harmless.

    The public are fed this image of child porn as being sadistic, abusive and evil but in reality material like that is proportionately non-existent. The vast majority (literally 99+%) of child porn is just harmless pictures of adolescents or children posing nude or adolescents having consensual sex. The real abusive stuff involving violence or forced sex is extremely rare and unrepresentative.

    About a decade ago there was company of studios in the Ukraine called LS Studios who made and sold erotic pictures and videos of young girls. Most of the models were adolescents about 10-16 and some were a bit younger. The material showed girls posing naked or near-naked in photography studios and sometimes outdoors at the beach, for example. The girls were clearly enjoying what they were doing and weren’t forced into it. No sensible person would say the girls were abused.

    Eventually, the studios were raided by the police and shut down. The media predictably described the people running the studios as “child porn gangs” and framed the girls as victims who were forced to perform. The media and the government feel they have to portray all child porn as evil and can’t accept that most of it is harmless stuff that the kids enjoyed making.

    • holocaust21 says:

      A very good point and infact back in the 70s you could wonder into any porn shop in many parts of Europe and there was the child porn right next to the adult porn! In some countries that situation continued somewhat into the 90s until anglo-fascism started spreading across the world.

      There was also a Danish company called Color Climax (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Climax_Corporation) which are still in existence who produced loads of child pornography in the 1970s with children as young as 7. The company still exists I believe, but is now adult pornography only.

  3. Pingback: The Copine Scale | Copine 1 and 2

  4. Shooter says:

    If you are legitimately trying to prove that sex with children is normal, yet call Tony Blair’s cabinet ministers evil for being paedophiles, it shows that you are good at double-talking rhetoric, or are upset because men can’t have sex with children. Why do you even call your blog ‘Holocaust21’, discussing the holocaust of men, women, and children, when you say there is nothing wrong with it?

    The study you cite, a meta-analysis, does not offer any rebuttals but seems to walk in many circles (Some studies find/some authors state/some say this/ etc. Not to mention it is on a site that advocates boy-love and sex with children so long as the child consents, and that children’s innocence is just a ‘myth’. Well then, I suppose sex-ed programs aimed at five-year-olds is acceptable, then?

    You write,

    “It is a well known fact that police officers are lazy. They like to go for the easiest to lynch people. There is no one easier to lynch than sexting teenagers. Often unaware that what they are doing is even illegal they become an easy catch for the paedophile unit.” – For starters, teenagers should not be posting their genitalia on the Internet. They are not adults, and it’s a manner of common sense for them to be responsible for their actions. Girls that show pictures of their breasts and vagina may be doing it for a boyfriend, but any individual can see it on the Internet.

    Second, ‘well known fact’? You sound like a Cop Blocker.

    “The propagation of child pornography and age of consent laws means that making arrests is like shooting fish in a barrel. And amongst the fish, big bad fish can hide and not be shot because they are not the targets.” – Why would they be bad if child-love is acceptable? What’s the point of age of consent laws if everyone can consent?

    “Criminalising low-level, harmless consensual sexual behaviour results in kind and harmless individuals being piled up in prison whilst real violent thugs and rapists are free to abuse and rape again.” – Paedophilia is not harmless, and it is certainly not consensual. A child is not going to know what sex is. They have not reached puberty. Why do you think child brides die so young? Because their vaginas haven’t fully developed yet.

    Do you know who used the ‘we don’t harm anyone’ meme? Homosexuals did. They told us their lifestyles wouldn’t harm anyone, but it contributed to the rise of the AIDS crisis and health tourism. You cannot deny this. In the same vein, by saying ‘paedophiles do no harm’ you need to prove without a doubt that it is normal love. In the animal world, males don’t mate with females unless the female has gone into estrus. We humans are the same way. Lions don’t rape cubs. Normal people see a child and they want to protect, not sexualize it. But no. You cite from a pro-paedophile library that says it is all normal and fine.

    You write,

    “So-called ‘extreme pornography’ which included adults engaging in bestiality or BDSM also became criminalised. And now, images of women pretending to be raped is in the process of being criminalised.” – So, you enjoy such images, then? Hmm. I guess ‘Best Gore’ makes you twitch, eh?

    “This of course ignores the onslaught of anti-terrorist legislation, which makes glorifying terrorism illegal and has some extreme double standards.” – Why should terrorism be glorified in the first place, unless you sympathize with said terrorist policies? Sounds like double-speak to me, especially if said terrorists are threatening your nation’s security.

    “The terrorist murder of Osama Bin Laden for instance, glorified by the mainstream media, was not seen as criminal whilst calling for genocidal politicians from the American or British regimes to be hung, drawn and quartered would be. And let us not even get into the minefield of ‘hate speech’ legislation – such as ‘anti-racist’ speech…” – But you’re engaging in SJW code speech right now. bin Laden was a terrorist, and he was removed. The Taliban also, ironically, punishes boy-lovers.

    “The bottom line is that banning has become endemic to our political class. They will only ever be satisfied once everything is criminalised and the entire population live in cages.” – I guess if we normal people consider terrorists terrorists, we put ourselves in a cage, eh?

    Dude. You posted a ‘study’ from a pro-paedophilia group that was banned, and it wasn’t because of ERMAHGAWD hate speech. It was because they PUBLISHED child porn, that same thing you condemn. What I think this post, and ultimately, this blog, stems from is because you can’t get the underage pussy. You’re free to move to Saudi Arabia and get a child bride. It’s legal there, you know.

    • holocaust21 says:

      I’m not going to make a habit of replying to all your idiotic points but very briefly…

      If you are legitimately trying to prove that sex with children is normal, yet call Tony Blair’s cabinet ministers evil for being paedophiles, it shows that you are good at double-talking rhetoric, or are upset because men can’t have sex with children.

      Because it shows Tony Blair is a FUCKING HYPOCRITE. And no one likes a hypocrite!

      The study you cite, a meta-analysis, does not offer any rebuttals but seems to walk in many circles (Some studies find/some authors state/some say this/ etc.

      No it clearly concludes that many find their experiences to be neutral or positive (about 1/3 girls and 2/3 boys). For the remainder who are negative they found that they are not negative with a high intensity i.e. it is negative more in the sense of “oh the sex was boring” than “oh my whole life is over I’ll have to keep reliving my CSA experience again and again and again…”

      Not to mention it is on a site that advocates boy-love and sex with children so long as the child consents, and that children’s innocence is just a ‘myth’.

      The research is proper peer-reviewed research. It happens to be available on such a site because they are interested in keeping it online!

      Well then, I suppose sex-ed programs aimed at five-year-olds is acceptable, then?

      Yes, they are.

      Second, ‘well known fact’? You sound like a Cop Blocker.

      If that means that I hate the police then yes I do. There is only one group that I find more sickening than the feminazis and that’s the police. There is no bigger group of terrorists and murderers than the police.

      What’s the point of age of consent laws if everyone can consent?

      You said it yourself. Let’s abolish the age of consent!

      Why should terrorism be glorified in the first place, unless you sympathize with said terrorist policies? Sounds like double-speak to me, especially if said terrorists are threatening your nation’s security.

      The only thing threatening my nation’s security is the police and legislature. Combined they are by far the biggest terrorist organisation in the country.

      So-called “terrorist” laws come with an ideology of privilege. Certain individuals (police, politicians) can commit their terrorist acts without consequence (they are the privileged), but for those who disagree they are jailed for simply voicing their disagreement (they are the underclass).

      It was because they PUBLISHED child porn, that same thing you condemn

      No I celebrate child porn. The legalisation of child porn is symbolic of free expression.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s