Radical Feminist Emma Watson busted by Panama Papers

Surprise, surprise, Emma Watson – the radical feminist campaigner who is so disadvantaged by her “gender wage gap” that she has multi-millions stashed away (far more than 99% of the male population) – has been busted by the Panama Papers.

Being the lying feminist that she is, she claims she only opened an account for “privacy” – gaining no monetary advantages. Why would anyone only open an offshore account for “privacy”? The only reasons they would do it is to either not pay tax or launder money. To make things even more ridiculous she goes on to claim it’s for the sole purpose of “protecting her anonymity and safety”. What feminist drivel. Even when talking about finance she insists on playing the “victim” and claiming she’s worried about her “safety” wtf.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Radical Feminist Emma Watson busted by Panama Papers

  1. Alan Vaughn says:

    To make things even more ridiculous she goes on to claim it’s for the sole purpose of “protecting her anonymity and safety”. What feminist drivel. Even when talking about finance she insists on playing the “victim” and claiming she’s worried about her “safety” wtf.

    There is of course no chance that this more recently ‘evolved’ dollop of feminist scum in the form of a human being will even be investigated. For starters, she’s a female let alone all the other shit that goes completely in her favour. She could literally get away with murder for the same fucked-up reasons, especially if she killed a man or boy!! Truly nauseous…

  2. holocaust21 says:

    Good news. Spectator has attacked The Guardian accusing it of appearing “to be less interested when the beneficiary is a feminist campaigner who Alan Rusbridger — the former Guardian editor — recently appointed as a visiting fellow at Oxford’s Lady Margaret Hall.” http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/the-guardian-give-emma-watsons-offshore-company-a-miss/

    • Alan Vaughn says:

      Yeah and the comments are even better! It seems she doesn’t have too many ‘fans’ at The Spectator at least, along with The Guardian – that completely avoided the story about this entitled little slag unfortunate victim, who needs to ‘protect her anonymity’, WTF? 🙂 The same story that all other MSM houses couldn’t wait to hastily publish.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s