Guest Post: In Defense Of Minor Attracted People or I Think It’s Genocide

Recently someone started a thread on the MGTOW reddit entitled “What opinion do you hold that would probably get downvoted here?

And a user by the name of SpayAndNeuterUrPets replied with a massive essay pointing out that minor attraction is normal, has been criminalised by modern feminist laws and that it is basically a genocide amongst other thought provoking points. And I thought fuck me such a detailed analysis can’t go to waste at the bottom of some reddit thread. So I thought it should go to waste here too! Here follows his article:

In Defense of Minor Attracted People or I Think it’s Genocide.

People lived short brutish lives in our ancient history, 30,000 years ago, often dying around age 30. If girls didn’t get started reproducing just as soon as they hit puberty, they might not have lived long enough to see that their own children made it to puberty themselves; people had to reproduce early, the species literately depended on it. Therefore, it’s no coincidence that the age of puberty starts somewhere before half the age of 30. It also explains why there are so many people accused of being pedophiles, that’s the way nature has made some of us, to be attracted to youth as a reproductive strategy. But rather than discuss why there seems to be so many “pedophiles”, we chose to just throw them in jail. Truth is, it’s the way nature made them through evolution.

We are still running on 200,000 year old software, and no stupid, recently created, feel good, socially constructed laws are going to change that. There was no supportive social services in those ancient times, and young girls who lost their families either died or grew up quick. The ones that were attracted to older men survived, and eventually reproduced. That is why you have girls who like older men, and men who like young girls. It’s an adaptive strategy that worked in the past, simple as that. Men taking in young girls was natures answer to a social safety net.

It also explains why the model industry has such young models, they know men are attracted to youth, beauty and neoteny (look up the word). No one really thought much of it back in the day when Calvin Klein was using a 14 year old Brook Shields as a model. Only recently are people outraged so much over so little. I really think it is so the deep state can use it as a way to control our politicians. Makes you wonder.

Why persecute people for the way nature made them if they are not hurting anyone? No wonder the birth rate in western civilization is declining. Unfortunately, as always, religious prudes are standing in the way of sound reason but try to get your heads around the idea, it’s a sound theory. It very well might have made the difference between the human race surviving, and not to acknowledge this possibility is just being unreasonable. The economy has changed but our biology hasn’t. There is nothing wrong with being attracted to girls, and boys, around the age of puberty. It’s just recently that young people can’t find work, and people are stretching their child like behavior all the way into their 30’s.

Throwing people in jail for having an interest in young girls, and boys, around the age of puberty is just predatory policing for money, just like with drugs. Lawyers, politicians, law enforcement types, persecuting people for non-violent crimes that shouldn’t even be crimes in the first place, like drugs, which is really just to defend the racketeering of the medical/phama industry, and to prop up their socialist make-work jobs.

Being attracted to youth doesn’t make one a monster, it’s the way nature made us. What does make one a monster is destroying the lives of innocent men, and women, who did nothing more than follow their human nature. Not only does it destroy the lives of men when they are taken to prison but destroys the lives of the families, and pets, that depend on them. Think of all the poor animals that get hauled off to animal shelters,and get killed because their owners get put in prison for stupid, non-violent crimes, feeding the prison industry. If I was a cop, I would have trouble sleeping at night for thinking about all the lives I’ve destroyed.

Morality is just an subjective concept, a social construct created by parochial minded religious people that are trying to make you submit to their antiquated group think. They often craft shaming language toward you, accusing you of having a “high hope for a low heaven.” Evil and morality are points of view. Picture a cat playing with a mouse. To the cat, he is just playing with his food. To the mouse, the cat is the equivalent of evil it’s self. This on the other hand, this is not evil; this is evolution adapting people to be attracted to youth as an adaptive strategy. It’s the way we have evolved and is why there are so many supposed “pedophiles” everyone is freaking out about.

This is the realist’s perspective who lives by natural law and understands evolution – Life is a question, asked of the Universe, “Is this right?”…and answered by death if it isn’t. We literally evolved, through evolution, to be attracted to youth and neoteny to survive! If the trait of being attracted to youth was not beneficial, it would not have been passed on!

So, every one, stop being uptight prudes, know that everyone is different, and just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean that it isn’t or wasn’t at some point a good thing. Older people taking in younger people, as companions, was natures answer to a social safety net; there was no welfare for them when their parents died at an early age. Can you imagine using the strategy that women do today, of waiting ’till age 30 to have kids, back when there was no medical system of any kind, with your teeth rotting out of your heads! You people are silly for not seeing the obvious truths of our own biological evolution.

Again, our biology hasn’t changed, only the laws, and peoples brainwashed, reactive monkey, herd-like perspectives. Think for yourselves people! We are throwing people in jail for stupid non-violent crimes longer then people who attempt, or succeed, in murder because some stupid politicians were grandstanding for tougher laws that we didn’t need. It doesn’t even begin to make sense unless you consider it is being used to manipulate politicians through deep-state intimidation. Seems to me some arm twisting like that would explain a lot about the crazy decisions our politicians have made. I would say the age of consent of 12, like in Mexico, is about right for a legal cut off. Nature gave us every thing we need to consent to sex and that is the drive to have sex. I was a horny little bastard at 12, and so was everyone of that age around me. If you deny this, you are not only being disingenuous with yourself but everyone around you as well. Perhaps your memory is faulty, and doesn’t go back that far?

Do other animals wait for a certain age to have sex after they become able to sexually reproduce? No. It’s just as stupid to put limits on it for us after one has reached puberty. People had jobs at those ages 100 years ago. My father would be 92 this year if he was still alive, and he told me that when he was 14 he earned a man’s wage reading water meters. The population was younger in the past, on average, than they are now. In 1900, 18 percent of all American workers were under the age of 16. Child laborers often worked to help support their families. In colonial America, child labor was not a subject of controversy. It was an integral part of the agricultural and handcraft economy. Children not only worked on the family farm but were often hired out to other farmers. Boys customarily began their apprenticeship in a trade between ages ten and fourteen. Years ago each child you had made you richer, you could tend another acre of crops. Now, each child you have makes you poorer or if you are too poor to support them, burdens on the system.

The economy has changed but our biology hasn’t. We are keeping young people in school, which is essentially just giving them busy work to keep them out of the real economy, and treating them like kids longer and longer because the economy can’t support work for them, as it has all been outsourced due to globalism. The system is all screwed up, and people are too concerned about being called names rather than speak out about the real problems in western society.

I see a globalist system, which has shipped all our jobs over seas, and implemented silly laws restricting sex WELL beyond the ages of puberty. It looks more like a means of genocide to me. Those people in the middle east aren’t exactly having a shrinking population like Europeans in the west are. Yes, the young people are still having sex because they have a high sex drive, as nature intended. Nothing is going to stop that but instead of society pushing them into safe, monogamous, long-term relationships, they are making it to dangerous for that. Yes, these elites know what they are doing to us, and have been doing for a long time now. I think it’s genocide.

Grandparents were a rare breed until 30,000 years ago… when life expectancy grew http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2016759/Life-expectancy-Grandparents-rare-breed-30-000-years-ago.html

90 percent of a womens eggs are gone by age 30 http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/women-fertility-falls-lose-90-percent-eggs-30/story?id=9693015

This entry was posted in Articles, Free Speech, Men's Rights, Paedohysteria. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Guest Post: In Defense Of Minor Attracted People or I Think It’s Genocide

  1. Chinzork says:

    Decent essay, but it seems a bit reductionist to me. It would be simpler (and more accurate IMO) to simply point out that the Puritan-influenced myth of childhood sexual innocence is bullshit. The excessive appeal to evolutionary psychology in these essays is somewhat dubious IMO.

    Also, the idea of life being “short and brutish” back then is not quite true. What really happened is that infant mortality was much higher back then. If you survived your first few years, then you had a good shot of making it to a ripe old age. For example, if five people lived to 90 and 15 died at ages 0-5, then the average life expectancy is going to be pretty low. The natural human lifespan has not actually been increased at all.

  2. Tom Grauer says:

    This is an excellent essay. I believe that “if attraction to teenagers is such a rare pathology, why are so many people attracted to teenagers?” is a particularly strong talking point.

    Another notion that I would like to see emphasized is that, in our hindbrain or “lizard brain,” we’re all in fact attracted to teenagers, whether or not some of us are willing to admit to it; whereas our forebrain or “mammalian brain” can create the illusion that such an attraction doesn’t exist. Of course, more effort should be invested in explaining this idea, but its general thrust is that the reason many people today, for instance, consider it “gross” to be attracted to 15-year-olds, is due to the workings of their mammalian brain, which, imbued with modern notions such as “child innocence” and the entire victimological worldview, is playing a trick on them by distracting them away from what the more ancient, primitive parts of their brain tell them, namely things such as: “this young female is fertile, so go forth and copulate with her.”

    Roissy aka Heartiste has often mentioned the forebrain-hindbrain dichotomy, but he usually mentions it in relation to female sexuality and sundry associated subjects, specifically as regards the tendency of women to preach one thing (what their mammalian brain tells that to believe, e.g.: “I want a boyfriend who is a nice guy”) and then do something else entirely (what their lizard brain actually desires, e.g. having sex with a violent thug). We should shed light on this dichotomy from the perspective of our own male sexuality: that we men construct high-flown morality that is completely out-of-sync with how millions of years of evolution have shaped our old lizard brains, the result being that innocent men rot in jail simply for doing what evolution had spent millions of years programming them to do.

    Once this idea is intuitively grasped, it becomes much easier to argue for the legitimacy of attraction to minors.

    • stop ageism says:

      Puberty is largely responsible for adult sexuality. Puberty begins around age 9, not 18.
      Adult sexuality begins with puberty. Adulthood begins in adolescence.

      Child sexuality = pre-pubescent, in general, before the age of 9 years.

      Adult sexuality = pubescent, generally, from the age of 9 years.

  3. Pingback: Teen Pregnancy Has Collapsed Because of Conservative Dipshits Who Hate Nature – The Daily Antifeminist

  4. mandy jones says:

    The age of consent should be 12, so that way minors can have sex with other minors. However, it should still be illgeal for someone over 18 to have sexual activity with someone under 15. No more then three years apart for minors. Also there are five stages of puberty, so it should also depends on what stage the child in. Minors in stage 2 of 3? No. Minors in stage 4 and 5? Yes. However, I’m still not advocating adults on minor. What I’m saying is that another minor can have sex with that minor, as long they’re in their late staging. For example. A 15 year old boy wants to bang on a 12 year old girl who is in her 4th or 5th stage of puberty is fine. An older boy or men to bang her around stage 1-3 is not fine and is not natural. An adult wanting to bang on a 12 year old in her 4th or 5th stage is still normal, but still should be illegal. Why? Because girls are still mentally maturing at that age. Besides most girls want to have sex with who are a little older. Let’s say no older then 16 for 12, 17 for 13 and 18 for 14. Anyway it’s natural for a men ot women wanting bang on a minor who’s in their 4th or 5th stage of puberty. I mean just look at this>https://goo.gl/images/23sfWD
    Girls start developing breast at stage 2 ( 8-13 )but no no nipples until stage 4 (10-16)>https://goo.gl/images/PLDQrq
    Third stage of puberty for girls is 9-15 and 5th stage is 12-19 ( some sources say mostly around 14-17 )

    • holocaust21 says:

      I deleted some of your other comments as I feel you’re just spamming what you’ve already said. However, this comment amuses me as your rules for when to have sex sound more complicated than the tax code! And in a way that’s what this blog is protesting about, we don’t want sex to be a regulated activity.

      And no, sex with minors is perfectly fine. A 30 year old with a 12 year old is totally normal!

      • mandy jones says:

        Sorry, sometime I repeat myself without realizing it.

      • mandy jones says:

        I don’t know what taxs codes are, but once you study the 5 stages of puberty, they won’t be hard to understand. I have links posted on my first comment. Matter of fact they were never hard to understand. I have a mild mental disability ( call me retard. It’s you’re right ) and even I can understand the 5 stages of puberty. I believe that adolescents should not be having sex until they’re both physically ( 4th or 5th stage of puberty ), mentally and emotionally ready. There are 12 year olds who physically, mentally and emotionlly ready to have sex. However,I’m still not fond with a 40 year old on a 12 year old. A 14 year old on 12 year old is fine, but not 40 on 12 year olds. That’s just my opinion and the law.
        PS. I decided to change it from being no more then 3 years older to more 4 years older.

      • holocaust21 says:

        How can you not know what a tax code is!? And yet again you repeat the same unsubstantiated drivel advocating violence on those who have sex with 12 year olds based purely on your prejudice and nothing else.

        You’re right about having a mental disability. I also hope you have never had sex, because your mental disability means that it is illegal for you to have sex (using the same bizarre logic – or lack of – that you use to justify the AOC).

      • mandy jones says:

        Because I never seen taxs codes before. Duh.

  5. mandy jones says:

    I think that girls start having babies a short few years after puberty. One article explain that 12 year olds normally can’t get pregnant. I believe it was this one>https://mapbiology.wordpress.com/menarche/
    Also one article explain that some cavepeople did live past the age of 30>https://paleoleap.com/why-cavemen-didnt-die-young/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.